What’s in a name?

We are no longer Number One on Google. Oh bugger. As Timon and Pumbaa once mused:

“Thought of changing my name.”
“But what’s in a name?”

Timon and PumbaaThere’s been a lot of discussion recently about names and the opportunity to pick and choose them. This isn’t something most of us get to choose, or at least don’t bother with any concerted effort. There are the rare occasions where you get to choose a name for something or someone and have the metaphorical World as your metaphysical Oyster. When this opportunity presents itself you must take advantage of it and choose a name that is, well, Awesome.

Fort Awesome seemed like an almost obvious choice when it came to choosing our abode’s moniker. I struggle to remember any of the other candidates. I think “Sam’s Fuck Barn” may have been one of them, but I also may have just made that up for comedic effect. The name has mostly stood the test of time. It even survived a house-change, like Air Force One, only without the fighter escort. However it has become obvious that ‘awesome’ has lost its impact; most often the name is simplified to ‘The Fort’. Has the name’s time come and done a runner, like a pocket-watch with roid-rage? The initial disappointment that the name was not unique, turned, thanks to Google, into annoyance that we weren’t the number one hit. We have now had our time in the sun, and that time has passed. Is the name now so ingrained in each of us that it is heresy to even contemplate a different name; further sacrilege to consider another name as superior in the Comedic Arts? Alas New equals Funny and usurpers to the crown have made their piece, and it is funnier. Don’t burn me at that petrol-soaked tree, but The Trungalow Of Lusty Menance is good. We are officially Old News.

The second name-related thoughts come, irrevocably, to myself. You see I have two first names, but only a single surname. I am unable to answer the question “Does Jeff have a surname?” with anything better than the now-tired “No, it’s like Cher.” Jeff should have a surname, but it cannot be Jones. Jeff Jones is a leper in its lameness. But I have no idea what would be better. Jeff was just right at the time and anything else would seem forced. Maybe, like The Fort, it was of its time and cannot be altered. Or maybe I just need to open it to the audience.

Just as long as everybody doesn’t start fraking calling me Geoffrey.

7 Responses to “What’s in a name?”


  1. 1 Jee

    How about calling the house Jeff, and you’ll fromthismomentforth be known as Mr .Fortawe Some Esq.?

  2. 2 Nick

    “‘awesome’ has lost its impact”

    Through gross overruse, I posit.

    The Trungalow is good, but we came up with the name (particularly the bit about lusty menace) so presumably we hold the rights to it in some way. Let’s take it.

    Take it… it’s yours! As the television advertisement for perfume tells us.

    I’m also not sure how Greg finds these new posts before I do, when I live here a lot more than he does, which is not at all.

  3. 3 Mat

    The Trungalow is good, but we came up with the name

    Wrong wrong wrong wrong!

    You guys came up with the Lusty Menace bit, but trungalow was all me, baby, from the text message invite for doomage.

    I tried to think up of a few names that would suit the “Fort” moniker, but I only came up with “Fort Epic” and “Fort Guypants”, which aren’t really as good.

  4. 4 Mat

    Oh, and you know you guys are #1 on Google again… right?

  5. 5 Nick

    I’m sure you came up with something like “Tri-ungalow”, and we put it through our mangle of manageability.

    Mangleability.

  6. 6 Mat

    Mobility? It’s possible I said tri-ungalow. The thought was there though…

  7. 7 Helen

    At least you still have the same house make up. Helen’s house of whores suffered a vital blow when the smut king of the house left. Despite the beautiful women who resided in it all year it had hardly any whoriness for the last 12 months.

Comments are currently closed.